Diskussion:Breinigerberg

Letzter Kommentar: vor 14 Jahren von 79.49.33.251 in Abschnitt Das ist Spam

Das ist Spam

Bearbeiten

I can understand a wiki article in more editions, ok... But i can't understand what is the utility, NOW, of Breinigerberg in ALL editions of Wikipedia. In editions of languages located in the Americas or in far east Asia etc, also with few articles. It seems to me this (and Uetersen, and so on) is spam. Breinigerberg, as little village, has the encyclopedyc criteria for de.wp and en.wp... and more of the major editions. Are you sure is it necessary for ALL ? In a little wiki edition with 16-20 articles reguarding cheyenne, swahili, maori or guaranì (exemples) what is the utility, or better the sense, to find still by now Breinigerberg, Końskowola, Kurów & c ? In a wiki as this it could seem redundants also articles as Hamburg or Berlin. So, what is the sense ? For me it is the fame. Because Breinigerberg, an unknown Ortsteil near Aachen, is known by me, it is a phenomena of Wikipedia. Is it for tourism ? So, tourism or fame, it sounds like spam. Cheyenne wikipedians sayed it was spam, and not only them. --95.239.25.56 01:54, 29. Okt. 2009 (CET)Beantworten

In Wikipedia all cities, villages etc. are relevant. Therefore I see no reason, why Breinigerberg should be an exception. If you miss articles about other German villages or cities in Wikipedia please do not hesitate to write them.--~~ BBKurt 17:13, 30. Okt. 2009 (CET)Beantworten

An exception ... 200 articles for a mini village ... in luganda, cheyenne ... 200 ... I know that every village is relevant (policies of en.wp) ... i'm talking of this spam. --79.49.33.251 02:35, 20. Mär. 2010 (CET)Beantworten