Diskussion:TrapWire

Eigentümerstruktur falsch dargestellt!

Cubic ist Eigentümer von Abraxas und Abraxas ist Eigentümer von TrapWire. Breaking: Trapwire surveillance linked to Anonymizer and transport smart cards.

"TrapWire software is owned by TrapWire Inc., a Reston, VA company. But it wasn’t always. Abraxas Corporation created TrapWire under its subsidiary firm, Abraxas Applications Inc.. Abraxas Corporation trademarked the TrapWire software in a filing with the U.S. PTO in 2006. Abraxas Corporation is now owned by Cubic Corporation, which bought the firm in November 2010 for $124 million in cash." TrapWire and Stratfor are business partners – documentary evidence

"The TrapWire software is now owned by TrapWire Inc., a Reston, VA company. ...Abraxas Corp. created TrapWire under its subsidiary firm Abraxas Applications Inc., according to Public Intelligence, a respected research site. Abraxas Corp. trademarked the TrapWire software in a filing with the U.S. PTO in 2006...But Abraxas Corp. is now owned by Cubic Corporation, which bought the firm in November 2010 for $124 million in cash... According to one report, Cubic acquired Abraxas Corp., TrapWire's former parent company, after TrapWire was spun out as a separate entity. One of the terms of the acquisition was to "cause the corporate name of Abraxas Applications, Inc. to be changed to a name that does not include 'Abraxas' or any variation thereof."" Wikileaks uncovers TrapWire surveillance: FAQ zdnet.com August 14, 2012

Die aktuelle Darstellung des Artikels erscheint mir trotz der angegebenen Quelle als zweifelhaft. Nemissimo RSX 11:55, 15. Aug. 2012 (CEST)

Verbindung zu anderen Infrastrukturprojekten?

"To summarise: TrapWire operates a global surveillance system. Cubic runs transportation smart cards in cities around the world and also owns Anonymizer, the ‘private’ internet and email system. Now we learn that Cubic organised a deal with Barclays to run their credit cards. Cubic also provides defence systems to the US, British and Australian military (above video is Aussie forces training by Cubic). And all this in the week the new Bourne (Treadstone?) movie is released. All the details below…" TrapWire: the Barclays connection; UK & Aussie army training; questions asked of UK PM, Aussie Senate. Nemissimo RSX 11:59, 15. Aug. 2012 (CEST)

Eine ausführliche Beschreibung des Projektes und seines Kontextes findet sich unter TrapWire: The Truth Behind The Hype. Nemissimo RSX 12:32, 15. Aug. 2012 (CEST)

Cubic Corporation hat keine Verbindung zu TrapWire, Inc.

Die Abraxas Corporation, die Cubic Corporation im Dezember 2010 übernommen hat, hat keinerlei Verbindung zu Abraxas Applications, die jetzt als TrapWire, Inc. firmieren.

Hier ist die offizielle Stellungnahme der Cubic Corporation zu diesem Thema:

Cubic Corporation Has No Affiliation with Trapwire, Inc.

SAN DIEGO, Calif. – August 13, 2012 - Cubic Corporation (NYSE: CUB) acquired Abraxas Corporation on December 20, 2010. Abraxas Corporation then and now has no affiliation with Abraxas Applications now known as Trapwire, Inc. Erroneous reports have linked the company with Trapwire, Inc. Trapwire, Inc. is a risk mitigation technology and services company that builds and markets software products to prevent terrorist threats and criminal attacks.

Cubic Corporation is the parent company of three major business segments: defense systems, mission support services, and transportation. Cubic Defense Applications, a leading supplier of combat training systems, communications, cyber technologies, and global tracking solutions. Cubic Mission Support Services is a leading provider of training, operations, maintenance, and technical support services. Cubic Transportation Systems is the world’s leading provider of automated fare collection systems and services for public transit authorities. For more information about Cubic, see the company’s Web site at www.cubic.com. (nicht signierter Beitrag von Dbrukakis (Diskussion | Beiträge) 13:23, 16. Aug. 2012 (CEST))

Siehe auch

• Clean IT – Überwachungsprojekt in der EU

Kann jemand der Bezug zwischen den beiden Artikeln präzisieren? --Siehe-auch-Löscher (Diskussion) 13:12, 4. Mär. 2019 (CET)