Als Abrufstatistik (auch Trafficzähler-Tool / "Wikipedia article traffic statistics") wird meist stats.grok.se genannt. Es gibt jedoch auch noch andere tools.
Abrufstatistik tools
Bearbeitenstats.grok.se
Bearbeiten
- Abrufstatistik / "Wikipedia article traffic statistics" stats.grok.se pro Artikel, verschiedene Sprachversionen. user Henrik
- English Wikipedia Most viewed articles in 201304 stats.grok.se/en/top
- German Wikipedia Most viewed articles in 201304 stats.grok.se/de/top
wikistats Trafficvergleich emw
Bearbeiten.png)
- Tool zum Trafficvergleich von +1 Artikeln emw, toolserver (leider laaangsam)
Wiki ViewStats
Bearbeiten
- Wiki ViewStats:
Wiki ViewStats auf wmflabs von Benutzer:Wiki ViewStats, [1]
WikiProject Popular pages lists (toolserver, alexz)
Bearbeiten- WikiProject Popular pages lists (toolserver, alexz) (Due to significantly increased demand and performance issues with the current program, new requests for the popular page systems are not currently being accepted. This will be fixed with updates to the program that should be completed by November. Bsp.: en:Wikipedia:WikiProject Germany/Popular pages)
wikitrends by johang
Bearbeiten- wikitrends by johang:
- toolserver: ~johang/wikitrends/german-uptrends-this-week johang, 2008
- wmflabs (de.WP): german-uptrends-this-week, german-uptrends-today, german-most-visited-this-week, johang
- wmflabs (en.WP): english-uptrends-this-week johang
trendingtopics.org
Bearbeiten- trendingtopics.org Rising Last 24 hours, Trending Topics Last 30 Days, mit sparklines (April 2010, nicht aktuell)
Wikitrends Ed Summers
BearbeitenWEEKLYPEDIA
Bearbeiten- http://weekly.hatnote.com A list of the most edited Wikipedia articles and discussions from the last week. Delivered every Friday by email.
- http://weekly.hatnote.com/archive/de/20150814/weeklypedia_20150814.html
- languages: English, German, French, Korean, Estonian, Swedish, Danish, Italian, Catalan, Esperanto, Spanish, Farsi, Urdu, Chinese, Kannada, etc.
- Benutzer:Slaporte, https://github.com/hatnote/weeklypedia/ [2]
trending.eu/ martin.rycak.de
Bearbeiten- Martin Rycak: www.trending.eu / martin.rycak.de wikitrends Stündliche Zahlen +Täglich, wöchentlich, monatlich, verschiedene Sprachversionen.
Siehe auch Wikipedia-Zugriffszahlen bestätigen Second-Screen-Trend (17. November 2012)
wikitrends.eu
Bearbeiten- http://www.wikitrends.eu fr:WikiTrends (seit April 2014, Ingensi - groupe Cyrès)
wikipediatrends.com
Bearbeiten
- http://www.wikipediatrends.com/
- https://stats.wikimedia.org/#views-wikitrends (2014) Article views per month or year, based on dammit.lt files. Only English Wikipedia is supported. By Alex Druk and Sergey Chernyshev
wikipediaviews.org
Bearbeiten- http://wikipediaviews.org/
- Please list the Wikipedia page names for which you want view count statistics reported. Please enter one page name per line. Enter page names, not full URLs. You may also leave this blank and choose one of the alternative methods of specifying lists of pages.
- Note that these pageviews exclude pageviews on the mobile domain (m.wikipedia.org) but include bot pageviews.
wikifamo.us
Bearbeiten- http://wikifamo.us/
- Example: According to wikipedia, Charlemagne is 7% more popular than Louis XIV of France.
BaGLAMa
Bearbeiten
- BaGLAMa: View counts for pages using Commons images in certain category trees. by magnus
Glamorous
Bearbeiten- Glamorous, by magnus (Commons image usage on Wikimedia projects / tool to keep track of Commons images used on other projects)
- Glamorous on wmflabs (Glamorous on toolserver)
- Glamorous 2 on toolserver(3 December 2012: Henrik at stats.grok.se closed access because the demand (for my scripts, most likely) overloaded his server. Solution: Wait for Wikimedia to get their own stats server, Kraken, up-and-running (it apparently works already on labs). Until then, not much I can do.)
Treeviews
Bearbeiten- Treeviews, by magnus (tool to show monthly page views, for Wikipedia category trees)
- treeviews on wmflabs (Due to lack of speedy stats server, this tool will be slow. Have patience. Using https on this page does not work in all browsers, due to downstream http dependencies.)
- Treeviews on toolserver
- TreeViews2 on toolserver
Metronom
Bearbeiten- Metronom: Pageviews for articles you created (wmflabs, by Magnus Manske)
hay/langviews: Multilingual page views
Bearbeiten- Multilingual page views: Page views for an article in all available languages using the data from stats.grok.se. This shows you the last 30 days. (Hay's tools@tools.wmflabs) Beispiel. Langsam.
other
Bearbeiten- en:Wikipedia:Database reports/Most-watched pages
- en:User:West.andrew.g/Popular pages (5000 pages the most accessed on the English Wikipedia during the last defined week)
- en:User:West.andrew.g/Popular redlinks (weekly list of the most requested red links on English Wikipedia)
- Benutzer:Krdbot/Doku/Artikelchartlisten bzw. Kategorie:Wikipedia:Aufrufzahlen pro Kategorie, zum Einbinden
Pageview API
Bearbeiten
- http://wikifamo.us/ compare the popularity of two subjects across all linguistic versions articles (22/11/2015 — Retreiving data from wikimedia servers)
top.hatnote
Bearbeiten-
via Pageview API: Hatnote’s Top 100 Articles -
via Pageview API: Hatnote’s Top 100 Articles
musikanimal/pageviews
Bearbeiten
-
Pageviews article comparisons, Screenshot of https://analytics.wmflabs.org/demo/pageview-api/ -
Screenshot of https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews
Das Tool ist derzeit standardmäßig auf allen Seiten der deutschen Wikipedia im Seitenfuß eingebunden. Falls eine Anpassung des Tools gewünscht ist, kann das im folgenden beschriebene Skript verwendet werden, das auch die Verwendung des Tools auf allen Wikimediaprojekten ermöglicht und die zusätzliche Nutzung des bisher eingebundenen Tools stats.grok.se:
- https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews Pageview Comparison
- en:User:MusikAnimal/Tools: Cross-wiki page view analysis tool. Allows comparison of multiple pages, with options for date ranges, platform, user-agent, and exporting the data to CSV or JSON.
user script von °: Um die aktuellen Abrufzahlen einer Seite über das "Mehr"-Menü einzubinden, folgendes in die common.js oder global.js einbinden:
// wenn die Variable "mwASdays" nicht explizit gesetzt wird, wird eine Voreinstellung von 90 Tagen verwendet
mwASdays = 30;
mw.loader.load('//de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:°/mwArticleStatistics.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript');
- Wikipedia:Kurier#Abrufzahlen von Artikeln / Wikipedia_Diskussion:Kurier#Abrufzahlen / Wikipedia:Kurier#Update Abrufzahlen
Das oben angegebene Code-Schnipsel bindet das Skript ein. Weitere Konfigurationen sind möglich und auf dieser Seite beschrieben.
Seiteninformationen: pageviews
Bearbeiten- http://bf-wmpageview.wmflabs.org/wiki/Wikipedia?action=info
- the first version of the WikimediaPageViewInfo extension, you can see a demo at http://bf-wmpageview.wmflabs.org/wiki/Taylor_Swift?action=info [4]
- meta:Community Tech/Pageview stats tool
Abrufstatistik
Bearbeiten- stats.wikimedia PageViewsMonthlyMobile
- Page Views for Wikimedia, All Projects, All Platforms, Normalized.
- SquidReportGoogle: "In total Google was somehow involved in 47.2% of daily external page* requests. Google referred to our sites, through its services including search, maps, and Google Earth, 212,902,650 page views per day, representing 41.1% of our external page requests. Including all of its different search crawlers and services hosted on its servers, Google itself requested another 31,551,740 page pages per day, representing 6.1% of our external page requests."
- SquidReportOrigins usw.
- Wikimedia Report Card. Timeline stats for number of articles, page views, and active wikimedia editors. Another version
- vital-signs.wmflabs dewiki-Pageviews mobile/desktop (using the new pageview definition and exclude spider/bot views)
stats.grok.se Abrufstatistik FAQ
Bearbeiten- Siehe auch: en:Wikipedia:Web statistics tool
Wikipedia article traffic statistics (This is very much a beta service and may disappear or change at any time.) Frequent questions (stats.grok.se/about)
- Q: What does the stats measure?
- A: Page views.
- Q: Where does the data come from?
- A: Domas Mituzas put together a system to gather access statistics from wikipedia's squid cluster and publishes it here. This site is a mere visualizer of that data.
- Q: What is the logic for redirects and when a page gets moved do the stats move?
- A: It counts the title the page was accessed under, so redirects and moves will unfortunately split the statistics across two different statistics pages.
- Q:Is the data reliable?
- A: It is easily susceptible to deliberate attacks and manipulations, but for most articles it should give a fair view of the number of views. I wouldn't base any important decisions on these stats.
- Q:I have another question or comment!
- A: They should be directed at User:Henrik on Wikipedia.
- Woher kommen die Zahlen?
- The raw data is available here [5]
Links zu Disk.
Bearbeiten
- Wikipedia:Café/Archiv_2007_Q4#Besucherstatistik
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2008/Woche_13#Abrufzahlen für Howard Hughes
- Wikipedia page views, a global perspective (2) Zachte, January 14, 2010 released new wikistats reports, Wikipedia Page Views By Country and Per Wikipedia Language. (Like the other mentioned reports these are also based on the sampled server logs. One in thousand server accesses are logged and stored for a limited time for analysis purposes. (...) The 1:1000 sampled squid logs are scanned one day at a time. Counts per day are added to monthly totals. Since each record stands for thousand original server accesses, totals are multiplied by 1000. The counts do not include page requests by bots (crawlers, spiders, etc). Many bots make themselves known by sending identifying infomation with the page requests. Filtering those is easy. Unfortunately quite a few bots chose to stay anonymous. On average for every thousand pages viewed on one day by one person just one server request ends up in the log. (on average meaning it can be zero on one day, two on a another). But thousand page views is a huge amount for an ordinary person. By far the most ip addresses that occur more than once on a single day are bots, which can easily issue many thousands of page requests on a day. Therefore all ip addresses that occur more than once are skipped. A few very avid readers may thus be missing (false negatives). A huge school that sends all outgoing traffic over one ip address may also result in a handful of log records, that are discarded (again false negatives). At the other hand anonymous bots with modest activity may appear only once in the log and be counted (false positives). I am confident that these minor unavoidable imprecisions have little influence on final results. Note: do not mistake the page views presented in the reports for visits or even unique visitors. Those are entirely different metrics that can not be deduced from the sampled log.)
- Wikipedia:Kurier/Ausgabe_3_2010#Quizshows_erhöhen_die_Artikelaufrufszahlen
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2010/Woche_37#Grundrauschen durch Bot-Artikelaufrufe
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2010/Woche_49#Grosse_Stats-Schwankungen
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2011/Woche_02#TOP 100 meistbeobachtete Artikel
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2011/Woche_04#Abfrage der 100 am wenigsten besuchten Seiten
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2011/Woche_05#Zunehmender Missbrauch im Zusammenhang mit stats.grok.se und Ngai Chun Cheung sowie Ngai.cc
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2011/Woche_08#article_traffic-Analyse
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2011/Woche_36#article_traffic_statistics
- Wikipedia:Café/Archiv_2011_Q4#Freitag_Nachmittag
- State of page view stats (Aug 2011)
- page view stats redux (Sept 2011)
- Mystery of most-viewed pages on En.Wikipedia (Okt 2011) (in September the most popular page on the English Wikipedia was "Mathematical descriptions of opacity", with over 5.1 million views)
- (Rowan: I've grepped the sampled (1:1000) Squid logs for September 23rd, 24th and 25th, and I do indeed see that a vast, vast majority of requests for that article come from a single IP. In fact, I got output like this (...) which means that in the sampled log (we don't keep full access logs, only a 1:1000 sample) for September 24th, of the 1550 logged requests, 1548 came from our guy and 2 came from different, random people. This doesn't mean there were only 1550 visits to that page that day; due to the sampling, the real number is roughly near 1550*1000 = 1.55 million, which matches the 1.6M reported by stats.grok.se well enough. (...) So I guess this was just one IP hitting the same article ~1.5 million times per day for 3-4 days, for whatever reason.)
- Erik Zachte 2012 "In recent months half of wiktionary traffic came from one ip address, all requesting endless random pages. Some oversized test setup?"
- Wikipedia:Kurier/Ausgabe_2_2012#Schon_gewusst?_Unsere_Leser_lieben_Montage
- Wikipedia_Diskussion:Kurier/Archiv/2012/02#Leser & Montage
- Wikipedia:Café/Archiv_2012_Q1#Wer zum Teufel ist Kerstin Rühl?
- Wikipedia:Kurier/Ausgabe_3_2012#Wer zum Teufel ist Kerstin Rühl?
- Wikipedia_Diskussion:Kurier/Archiv/2012/03#Kerstin_R.
- Wikipedia:Kurier/Ausgabe_6_2012#Traffic-Tool gibt Auskunft über Anzahl der Seitenaufrufe
- Wikipedia_Diskussion:Kurier/Archiv/2012/06#Vorschlag_Artikel
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2012/Woche_12#Explodierende_Zugriffszahlen_auf_meine_BS
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2012/Woche_18#Anzeigen_von_Sackgasse_verdoppelt
- Wikipedia:Kurier/Ausgabe_9_2012#Abrufstatistik_leichter_abrufbar
- Wikipedia:Administratoren/Notizen/Archiv/2012/09#Abrufstatistik_im_Footer
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2012/Woche_23#Traue_keiner_Statistik_-_auch_nicht_stats.wikimedia.org.3F und Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2012/Woche_24#Traue_keiner_Statistik_-_auch_nicht_stats.wikimedia.org (Zachte zu Artikelstatistik-Fehler)
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2012/Woche_36#Artikelaufrufe
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2012/Woche_37#Abrufstatistik
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2012/Woche_46#Statistik Such-Zugänge
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2012/Woche_46#Statistik zählt auch für Abrufe auf Mobilversion? stats.grok.se
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2012/Woche_48#Abrufzahlen:_Top_Ten?
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2012/Woche_49#Zugriffszahlen auf die Hauptseite
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2012/Woche_49#Aktuelle_Abrufzahlenranglisten
- Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia/Archiv/2012/Woche_52#Sackgasse als Top Artikel ?!
- Wikipedia:Kurier/Ausgabe 12 2012#Mit der Statistik in die „Sackgasse“
- Wikipedia Diskussion:Kurier/Archiv/2012/12#Mit der Statistik in die „Sackgasse“
- Wikipedia:Fragen zur Wikipedia/Archiv/2013/Woche 03#Erstellen einer Zugriffsstatistik für alle Artikel in einer Kat
- Monthly page requests, new archives and reports Zachte, Monday January 14, 2013
- Im Februar 2013 hat ein Schwede bei Wikitech gefragt nach Page view stats we can believe in, also wieviele der Seitenabrufe eigentlich von Menschen sind: "Last quote I got (in April?) is that overall 40% of traffic is bot related. That could be more now. And it's far more for smaller projects, and for link-intensive Wiktionary, and for those languages of Wikipedia that create articles by bots, such as Dutch, Swedish, Vietnamese and Volapük. This bot-created article about a spider "has been viewed 12 times in the last 30 days", but only by bots? Bots creating articles and bots reading them, what a joke! And they are creating articles about spiders!" (Wikipedia_Diskussion:Kurier/Archiv/2013/03#Sportnews; Wikitech-l: Page views, Apr 2012; Wikitech-l: Bots create page views, Aug 2012)
- en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-02-04/Special report: Examining the popularity of Wikipedia articles: catalysts, trends, and applications (At the aggregate level, the distribution of page views follows a "power law distribution". Fig. 2 represents one months' views on Wikipedia graphed against a Zipf distribution (a distribution where the most frequent item will occur approximately twice as often as the next item, three times as often as the third item, and so forth.) The top 25 most viewed pages represent 4% of all total views, and the top 5000 represent 19% of all views. Though the distribution has an extremely long tail, the top 5000 data provides an opportunity to locate popular but poorly written articles that need attention, as opposed to randomly selecting one of the 4.15 million remaining articles on the project. That is not to say that articles deep in the long tail are less important, but for editors interested in prioritizing article improvement based on popularity and effect on public perception, the en:WP:5000 data is an important tool.) [6]
- en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-04-01/Special report: Who reads which Wikipedia? The WMF's surprising stats
- Wikipedia:Café/Archiv_2013_Q2#Die meistbesuchten Wikipedia-Seiten über deutsche Politiker Erik Zachte, April 2013
- Wikimedia-l: Increase in page views for the last 3 months nov 2013 (Erik Zachte: "We have found the cause of the unbelievable growth in page views, and it turns out to be an bug indeed. Around August 2013 a site change caused internal housekeeping messages to be counted as page views by our webstatscollector software. As the patch was rolled out progressively, every month more bogus page views were added, up to several billion per month in November. All page review reports now have a very clear warning about this issue.") [7], [8]
- pagecounts-raw news Jan 2015
- Analytics Mailinglist: Predicting movie success using Wikipedia traffic
google Knowledge Graph
Bearbeiten
Wikipedia mobile
Bearbeiten
Nutzungszahlen
Bearbeiten| Nutzung von Wikipedia
(in % der Internetnutzer in D) |
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
| Gelegentlich (zumindest selten) | 47 | 60 | 65 | 73 | 70 | 72 | 74 | 76 | |
| Regelmäßig (zumindest wöchentlich) | 20 | 25 | 28 | 31 | 29 | 30 | 32 | 41 | 45 |
| Täglich [9] [10] | 6 | 12 |
| Mindestens einmal wöchentlich Wikipedia Nutzung
(ab 2015: "Online Nachschlagewerke wie Wikipedia nutzen") |
2007 [11] | 2012 [12] | 2015 [13] |
| 14- bis 29-Jährige Onlinenutzer in D | 35% | 41% | 57% |
| Insgesamt Onlinenutzer in D | 20% | 30% | 45% |
| Täglich/mehrmals pro Woche Wikipedia o.ä. nutzen | 2012 [14] | 2013 [15] | 2014 [16] | 2015 [17] |
| 12- bis 19-Jährigen Internetnutzer in D | 36% | 38% | 40% | 42% |
| 2013 Befragte |
2013 % von Befragte |
2013 % von Nutzer |
2015 Befragte |
2015 % von Befragte |
2015 % von Nutzer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mehrmals täglich | 86 | 11,6% | 11,70% | 181 | 13,4% | 15,86% |
| täglich | 129 | 17,5% | 17,55% | 226 | 16,7% | 19,81% |
| mehrfach wöchentlich | 261 | 35,2% | 35,51% | 418 | 30,9% | 36,63% |
| wöchentlich | 135 | 18,3% | 18,37% | 216 | 16,0% | 18,93% |
| monatlich | 90 | 12,1% | 12,24% | 87 | 6,4% | 7,62% |
| seltener | 34 | 4,6% | 4,63% | 13 | 1,0% | 1,14% |
| keine Angabe | 5 | 0,7% | 213 | 15,7% | ||
| Insgesamt | 740 | ~100% | 100% (735) | 1354 | ~100% | 100% (1141) |
| zumindest wöchentlich (=mehrm. tägl. + tägl. + mehrf. wöchentl. + wöchentl.) |
82,6% | 83,13% | 77% | 91,24% |
| Welche Wikipedia Sprachversionen werden in Deutschland abgerufen (Leser)? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deutschsprachige WP | 82,4 % | |||
| Englische WP | 12,4 % | |||
| Andere WP Sprachversionen | 5,2 % | |||
| Prozent der page views. Wikipedia Page Views Per Country Wikistats SquidReport, Germany for period: 1 Jul 2009 - 31 Oct 2013 (last 12 months) | ||||
| Welche Wikipedia Sprachversionen werden in Österreich abgerufen (Leser)? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deutschsprachige WP | 78,0 % | |||
| Englische WP | 16,3 % | |||
| Andere WP Sprachversionen | 4,6 % | |||
| Prozent der page views. Wikipedia Page Views Per Country Wikistats SquidReport, Austria for period: 1 Jul 2009 - 31 Oct 2013 (last 12 months) | ||||
| Welche Wikipedia Sprachversionen werden in der Schweiz abgerufen (Leser)? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deutschsprachige WP | 53,9 % | |||
| Englische WP | 19,8 % | |||
| Französische WP | 16,8 % | |||
| Italienische WP | 4,2 % | |||
| Andere WP Sprachversionen | 3,9 % | |||
| Prozent der page views. Wikipedia Page Views Per Country Wikistats SquidReport, Switzerland for period: 1 Jul 2009 - 31 Oct 2013 (last 12 months) | ||||
| Von wo kommen die Seitenabrufe (Leser) der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deutschland | 79,0 % | |||
| Österreich | 8,3 % | |||
| Schweiz | 5,8 % | |||
| USA | 0,7 % | |||
| Italien | 0,5 % | |||
| Andere Länder | 5,7 % | |||
| Prozent der Bearbeitungen. Page Views Per Wikipedia Language Wikistats SquidReport, de.wikipedia for period: 1 Jul 2009 - 31 Oct 2013 (last 12 months) | ||||
| Von wo stammen die Bearbeitungen der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deutschland | 83,4 % | |||
| Österreich | 7,0 % | |||
| Schweiz | 4,1 % | |||
| Italien | 0,6 % | |||
| USA | 0,5 % | |||
| Andere Länder | 4,4 % | |||
| Prozent der Bearbeitungen. Page Edits Per Wikipedia Language Wikistats SquidReport, de.wikipedia for period: 1 Jul 2009 - 30 Sep 2013 (last 12 months) | ||||
| Welche Wikipedia Sprachversionen werden von Deutschland aus bearbeitet? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deutschsprachige WP | 82,7 % | |||
| Englische WP | 8,6 % | |||
| Russische WP | 1,1 % | |||
| Andere WP Sprachversionen | 7,6 % | |||
| Prozent der page edits. Wikipedia Page Edits Per Country Wikistats SquidReport, Germany for period: 1 Jul 2009 - 30 Sep 2013 (last 12 months) | ||||
Siehe auch
Bearbeiten- Wikipedia Page View Reflects Web Search Trend Mitsuo Yoshida, Yuki Arase, Takaaki Tsunoda, Mikio Yamamoto (Submitted on 7 Sep 2015)
- https://archive.org/search.php?query=wikipedia_visitor_stats
- [18][19][20]
- https://discovery.wmflabs.org/external/
